Which of the following practices are considered best practices in UiPath development?

Breaking the process into smaller workflows and reusing workflows across different projects are essential best practices in UiPath development.

Creating smaller workflows promotes modularity and enhances maintainability. By splitting processes into manageable components, developers can isolate issues more effectively, making debugging and updates easier. Each smaller workflow can be tested independently, which contributes to higher reliability and lowers the risk of introducing bugs when changes are made.

Reusing workflows across different projects maximizes efficiency and reduces redundancy. When developers create a library of reusable workflows, they save time and effort that would otherwise be spent rewriting similar processes for different automations. This also ensures consistency, as the same workflow will operate the same way across all projects it is utilized in, leading to a more uniform approach to automation.

In contrast, hard coding environment settings inside workflows can lead to inflexible designs that are difficult to maintain. Such practices make it challenging to manage changes across environments (e.g., moving from development to production), as those settings need to be altered directly in the workflow instead of through external configuration files or assets. This approach can lead to errors and increase the time required for future updates.