Why is renaming activities considered to be one of the best practices?

Renaming activities is regarded as one of the best practices because it enhances the readability and comprehensibility of the process logic. When activities are aptly named, they provide immediate context and meaning to their functions, which allows anyone reviewing the workflow to grasp the intended operations without the need to delve into each sequence of invoked workflows. This approach streamlines the development and maintenance processes, as it minimizes the cognitive load required to understand the overall functionality of the automation. A well-named activity acts as documentation in itself, contributing to easier debugging and quicker onboarding for new team members who may be unfamiliar with the workflow.

In this context, the other options, while they may seem relevant, do not capture the primary essence of why renaming activities is beneficial. For instance, understanding the source of an exception relates more to exception handling and debugging than to clarity in workflow design. Similarly, while understanding high-level business logic is important, it is primarily achieved through effectively organized and named activities. Lastly, performance improvements in workflow execution are not linked to activity naming; they rely on optimization strategies rather than nomenclature practices.